Here is a tale of two supporters of The Response.
John Benefiel is founder of the Heartland Apostolic Prayer Network and endorser of the upcoming prayer meeting, The Response, initiated by Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) and funded by the American Family Association. Benefiel has focused on repairing relationships with Native Americans. His reasons are spiritual. For instance, he teaches that Oklahoma’s high divorce rate is due to the fact that Oklahoma was once home to the Indian Territory, a place where the government broke covenants with Native Americans. Over the years, people have been inspired by dark forces to break their marriage vows because the government broke vows with the native nations of the land. Thus, the support for making amends with native people is not simply to do the right thing, rather the big picture is to clear the land of demonic influence so that Benefiel’s version of Christianity can take hold.
Bryan Fischer is an Issues Analyst for the AFA, the group funding the event endorsed by Mr. Benefiel. Mr. Fischer has said that Native Americas were morally disqualified from ownership of their lands because of their savagry and immorality. The AFA website provides Mr. Fischer a forum to say the Indians got what they deserved because they refused to convert to Christianity. Fischer and Mr. Benefiel surely seem to disagree about this matter.
Mr. Fischer also preaches that the Nazi party was full of gays, Hitler was gay and needed gays to enforce his evil intentions. According to Fischer, gays in the Nazi military gave the world 6 million dead Jews.
Mr. Benefiel has something to say about Hitler and the Nazi era as well. Roll the tape:
The only reference to this possibility that I can find is John Toland’s biography of Adolf Hitler, where he wrote:
If we believe Bryan Fischer (which I don’t), then Hitler was some kind of gay and his brutality was because of it. Now we hear, from Apostle Benefiel and author John Toland, that the Nazis were inspired by the cruelty of the Christian nation America toward our indigenous people. Wow.
Benefiel and President Obama have something in common according to Fischer. According to Fischer when we consider America’s treatment of Native Americans, there are two conceptual options:
The template that the left has generated is that the displacement of indigenous tribes by European colonists and settlers was irredeemably evil. All the land which now comprises the United States was stolen from its rightful owners. Our very presence on this soil is a guilty, tainted presence.
So the question is whether that template is right, or whether the displacement of indigenous nations was consistent with the laws of nature, nature’s God, and the law of nations and history.
A lot is at stake here. If Americans believe that the entire history of our nation rests on a horribly evil foundation, then there is nothing to be proud of in American history, and our president is correct to identify America as the source of all evil in the world and to make a career out of apologizing for her very existence.
If, however, there is a moral and ethical basis for our displacement of native American tribes, and if our westward expansion and settlement are in fact consistent with the laws of nature, nature’s God, and the law of nations, then Americans have much to be proud of.
On the matter of native people and the evil perpetrated, Benefiel and President Obama are on the same page.
Obviously making amends with Native Americans is a big deal to Benefiel. And to his credit, he has investigated and documented the evil treatment of indigenous people by the American government. However, given his belief in curses and apologies, it is hard for me to understand how he can endorse an event like The Response, funded by the AFA, which condones Bryan Fischer’s derogatory views of Native Americans as a race of people.
One observation that I can make here is that Christian conservatives are not as monolithic a group as those outside the group think we are. Since I would be somewhere in there, the boundaries expand to even greater reaches.
It does raise for me a question about the intent of events like The Response. To which god are these folks praying? Are they praying to the one who demands an apology for evil done to Native Americans, or the one who empowered the Europeans to displace the indigenous people?
Well, at least The Response is bringing people of competing ideologies together.
(Thanks to Kyle Mantyla at Right Wing Watch for the tip.)
Video is derived from this sermon.
I don’t buy into this. I’m pretty sure Hitler considered a lot of ways to control people. The US’s treatment of Native Americans was likely one among many. One reason I believe that is because of the lack of similarity between the way Hitler treated Jews vs. the way we treated Native Americans. I see very little common ground. Hitler’s main theme was gathering them up into death camps and gassing and machine gunning them and the US’s main theme was making war with them and marching them on long relocating journeys where most of them died on the way. That is NOT to say that BOTH aren’t terrible. I think about what we did to Native Americans and it makes me just as sick as when I think about all the Jews, innocent children and infants alike who died horrible deaths at the hands of those animals.
AFA and the 7 Mountain movement:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_M7m8D85iXw&feature=player_embedded
Back in 2007 but only recently shared:
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2011/9/12/113150/251
And some native Americans did go along with it. And recently:
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/jacobs-response-broke-curse-native-american-cannibals
Yes, the Response broke the curse of native American cannibals. Let’s not forget also that there was same-sex marriage among many Native American tribes. I guess the floods that caused me not to get crops these last two years were….? But what does that mean for those godly people next door?
And because I thought RRW cut off her explanation, I went and listened to the rest (where Cindy Jacobs herself says, “we tell you what god knows.”). It turns out Jacobs went on to say that she relies upon ‘divine revelation’ from the holy spirit to determine why the land is cursed. In other words, nevermind the facts about a previous culture, you’ll get your answer in prayer.
Her husband went on to say that he saw a person in Florida with a daughter who is sick and they cannot understand why. He said the Seminoles used to live on that land and it is cursed. Cindy says Native American leaders are “wising up” and coming to her viewpoint.
All a bit pretentious if you ask me.
. . .
Back in 2007 but only recently shared:
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2011/9/12/113150/251
And some native Americans did go along with it. And recently:
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/jacobs-response-broke-curse-native-american-cannibals
Yes, the Response broke the curse of native American cannibals. Let’s not forget also that there was same-sex marriage among many Native American tribes. I guess the floods that caused me not to get crops these last two years were….? But what does that mean for those godly people next door?
And because I thought RRW cut off her explanation, I went and listened to the rest (where Cindy Jacobs herself says, “we tell you what god knows.”). It turns out Jacobs went on to say that she relies upon ‘divine revelation’ from the holy spirit to determine why the land is cursed. In other words, nevermind the facts about a previous culture, you’ll get your answer in prayer.
Her husband went on to say that he saw a person in Florida with a daughter who is sick and they cannot understand why. He said the Seminoles used to live on that land and it is cursed. Cindy says Native American leaders are “wising up” and coming to her viewpoint.
All a bit pretentious if you ask me.
. . .
AFA and the 7 Mountain movement:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_M7m8D85iXw&feature=player_embedded