American Family Association Takes Aim at Critic of The Response

The whole article is up at Religion Dispatches.

The American Family Association has taken aim at fellow religious conservative Brannon Howse over his criticism of the AFA’s recent sponsorship of GOP presidential candidate Rick Perry’s The Response prayer meeting. Earlier this week, Jim Stanley, program director of AFA’s radio network, American Family Radio, sent notices to two talk show hosts who are associated with Howse, informing them that continued presence on the AFA’s radio network was conditioned on severing ties with Howse.
The talk show hosts, John Loeffler and Todd Friel, have shows aired by American Family Radio and also speak at Howse sponsored events. According to Tim Wildmon, president of the AFA, “we identified two people with programs on our networks and told them, ’you have to make a choice.’” In defense of the move, Wildmon said “AFR is under no obligation to run programs of individuals who are going to help Brannon when he is attacking our friends. We make programming decisions all the time.”

Todd Friel and John Loeffler are two guys who were doing their own thing and then out of the blue they get an email from American Family Radio telling them to make a choice. Neither one of them had taken sides with Howse against the AFA’s involvement in The Response. Still they must pick a side now. Loeffler chose to leave the radio station. No word from Friel as yet. He has until Wednesday to cancel with Howse or else the AFA will remove his show.
On a broadcast last week, Thursday I think, Howse said an unnamed evangelical figure wrote to him to say that he had large “megaphones” to use in order to “decimate” Howse’s ministry. The only other evangelical I know who has mentioned Howse in a critical way is David Barton, using the megaphone of Wallbuilders Live.
This is a kind of internecine war where the ideological issues are complicated. Howse is a social conservative speaker who has worked with Barton and the AFA. However, Howse believes it is wrong for Christians to partner with the New Apostolic Reformation. From Howse point of view, the NAR is not apostolic nor a reformation. Most of the teachings are heretical and the AFA and other social conservative groups are selling out to NAR for a mess of right wing political pottage.

2 thoughts on “American Family Association Takes Aim at Critic of The Response”

  1. Interesting that Howse should talk of heresy. I think the danger of heresy is often underestimated: ‘getting God wrong’ leads to all kinds of distortions in all fields of life.
    Of course, we all ‘get God wrong’; such is part and parcel of the human condition. What so often marks out a heretic (as opposed to someone who ‘gets things wrong’) is the refusal to recognize human limitations when it comes to ‘understanding God and his ways’. It is perhaps the very certainty of ‘christian’ fundamentalism that is its theological and moral undoing.
    The ‘dominionist’ tendency is based on an incomplete, even incorrect, understanding of God. One of the principal functions of the Old Testament (so beloved by dominionists) is to show us how the human understanding of God is in constant need of growth and refinement (early O.T. ideas of God are actually very ‘tribal’ and ‘all-too-human’ when one thinks about it, and those very same ideas were so often the object of strident criticism by the Prophets).

  2. Interesting that Howse should talk of heresy. I think the danger of heresy is often underestimated: ‘getting God wrong’ leads to all kinds of distortions in all fields of life.
    Of course, we all ‘get God wrong’; such is part and parcel of the human condition. What so often marks out a heretic (as opposed to someone who ‘gets things wrong’) is the refusal to recognize human limitations when it comes to ‘understanding God and his ways’. It is perhaps the very certainty of ‘christian’ fundamentalism that is its theological and moral undoing.
    The ‘dominionist’ tendency is based on an incomplete, even incorrect, understanding of God. One of the principal functions of the Old Testament (so beloved by dominionists) is to show us how the human understanding of God is in constant need of growth and refinement (early O.T. ideas of God are actually very ‘tribal’ and ‘all-too-human’ when one thinks about it, and those very same ideas were so often the object of strident criticism by the Prophets).

Comments are closed.