The Anti-Homosexuality Bill has some American defenders

Sadly, some in America defend Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2009. A brief summary:

I have already noted that Scott Lively is defending himself and the bill by saying it is a “step in the right direction.” A few are emerging to agree.

Gary Demar runs an organization called American Vision and recently posted this piece by Joel McDurmon, A Perfect Hatred. This article reveals an extreme form of Calvinist dominionism, writing:

Now, it just so happens that God revealed that the homosexual act is a civil crime, and it just so happens that He revealed that the homosexual act as a civil crime deserves the death penalty. Warren disagrees. He argues, “Since God created all, and Jesus suffered and died for all, then we are to treat all with respect.” Of course, Jesus never claimed to suffer and die for all; He claimed to give his life as a ransom for many (Matt. 20:28; 26:28; Heb. 2:10; 9:28). Likewise, God did not create all for unqualified “respect,” but some to be vessels of dishonor and destruction (Rom. 9:21–23).

Odd that this writer would quote the New Testament book of Hebrews since that book designates a new and better way than law keeping as a means of relating to God. American Vision’s motto is “exercising servanthood dominion” which depicts the aim of this group: Equipping and Empowering Christians to Restore America’s Biblical Foundation (Psalm 11:3). Apparently, the church is supposed to enact biblical law (except maybe the law of love) as they understand it and rule as a theocracy.

This blogger thinks the bill is just fine and needed here as well. Another Calvinist dominionist.

Some are believing the spin that the bill only punishes child abuse and rape and become defenders in ignorance. Vox Populi says it took him “thirty seconds of research” to learn that critics are misleading people. The irony? He linked to the copy of the bill hosted here.  This is the same copy linked to by the NYT, WashPo and SF Chronicle. What seems clear to me is that he only read for about 30 seconds and closed his eyes.

Others are defending some of the people involved. For instance, this news release from the World Congress of Families defends Don Schmierer.  The news release focuses on Schmierer but includes Brundidge and Lively when it states:

Don Schmierer and two other evangelicals from the United States spoke in Uganda last March.  In the course of their remarks, they discussed the ability of individuals to mend broken family relationships, change destructive behaviors, and to leave the homosexual lifestyle. 

Apparently, the WCF doesn’t need to explore the facts about the situation.  In my view, they fail to grasp the fullness of what was done there, especially the venom of Scott Lively. In fact, Don Schmierer understands the anger directed his way as he notes in this interview with the Lodi (CA) News-Sentinel:

“It wasn’t what we agreed on for advertising,” Schmierer said. “He had me write out 45-minute speech on healthy parenting. I found out a week before I got there he made it a three-day event and added more people. One guy was speaking on fighting the gay agenda. The way we were all listed on the program, I can see why people lump us together.” 

And then there is this very strange article by “Accuracy in Media’s” Cliff Kincaid, asserting that somehow Uganda came along to divert attention from Kevin Jennings’ problems. Ironically, Kincaid’s rendering of the bill is inaccuracy in media while blaming others for creating a stir over Uganda to get Jennings off the hook.  And then in strange-article-#2, Kincaid takes on every gay related story in one place, mentioning that the Uganda bill “goes too far even for pro-family” advocates. Reading the rest of the article, I have to wonder if he is one of those pro-family advocates.

Readers: Let me know if you see any other groups defending the bill or those associated with it.

UPDATE: Lively now endorses the bill.

8 thoughts on “The Anti-Homosexuality Bill has some American defenders”

  1. Good for the Archbishop who is standing up for the teaching of the church and for the teaching of Christ without having to distort the scriptures to do so.

  3. You’ve been had by C4C:

    If scientists actually left their basements for a moment and took a good look around, they would learn that the earth is flat, through empiricism. If scientists would try praying to Jesus Christ over their Parkison’s disease, rather than faking the symptoms, they would realize that Heliocentrism is utter nonsense. … Empiricism would also lead them to see that bats are birds, other than their reproduction mechanisms (Leviticus 11:19).

    It’s becoming more and more difficult to sort the real extremists from the parodies.

    This one’s more Landover than Westboro Baptist.

    I think.

  5. American Vision is a Reconstructionist/Dominionist group a la Rushdooney. Same with the other blog. Odd that he seemed to want to own his hate, he just hated when anyone else said he hated gays. It was rather funny how he kept running around the issue, yes, but no, there’s good hate, but the liberal…. and making the idea that a god should be love out to be completely worthless. Reading the comments on the second blog was certainly eye-opening.

    .

    You can probably throw in the World Congress of Families into that general umbrella and Don Schmierer and Howard Ahmanson Jr have both been signatories to some of the WCF letter/declaration. The WCF was founded in 1997 by Allan Carlson and is a project of The Howard Center for Family, Religion & Society in Rockford, Illinois (www.profam.org). Seems there was a connection between the Watchmen on the Wall and the WCF in Riga, Latvia, along with “American activist Scott Lively, president of Defend The Family International.” Both Schmierer and Lively signed the WCF letter on Defense of Marriage in Romania early in 2008.

    So why doesn’t WCF show the love for Lively as well?

    …

  6. I am an aggravated homosexual. I am interested in the Uganda Consuls here in the US. Do you know anything about Matthew Wendell Crouch – the consul in LA – whose parents own Trinity Broadcasting Network.

    Secondly – do you know anything about the American Ugandan Partnership Organization. They have Christian ties to Uganda but I have not been able to get they to say what their position is.

    Thank you for the work you are doing.

  7. American Vision seems like the very definition of a fringe group, one not likely to have influence. And yet that’s not the case, at least not so far as historical revisionism goes. Along with David Barton, they’ve rewritten the past, to make the U.S. a Christian nation destined for world domination. They’ve been remarkably successful at getting this reading — complete with any number of manufactured facts — into homeschooling and Christian school curricula. They’ve also focused on political elites, with some success. The history tours typically led by politicians at every year’s National Prayer Breakfast — C Streeter Rep. Zach Wamp leads one, as has John Ashcroft in the past — rely heavily on this school of thought. The success of American Vision may be rooted in the anti-intellectualism of contemporary evangelicalism, as diagnosed by evangelical scholar and Wheaton College historian Mark Noll. With critical thought and intellectual inquiry devalued, the field of interpretation becomes wide open. Fools — or, as in the case of Demar, hatemongers — rush in, and there simply isn’t the depth of knowledge in most communities to counter their message. That’s what makes their advocacy of the bill — there and maybe here — more dangerous than the rantings of loons.

  8. Apparently, the church is supposed to enact biblical law (except maybe the law of love) as they understand it and rule as a theocracy

    Head shaking. No kidding.

Comments are closed.