Comments on: Bahati says law is silent about defilement of boys; 2007 law says otherwise

By: Uganda’s Monitor interviews Bahati and gay advocate; Bahati admits bill redundant — Warren Throckmorton

Sun, 22 May 2011 00:32:15 +0000

[...] not miss the significance of this. Bahati and Ssempa have been saying that the law is needed to protect boy children. The Penal Code Amendment Act made the defilement laws very stringent and gender [...]

By: Pastor decries “misrepresentation” of “kill the gays” bill

Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:06:13 +0000

[...] ‘s claim that Ugandan law doesn’t address the molestation of boys by adult males is inaccurate. On April 18, 2007, the Uganda Parliament passed the Penal Code Amendment Act of 2007 and corrected [...]

By: Correcting Canyon Ridge: What Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Bill really says — Warren Throckmorton

Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:15:19 +0000

[...] Odor wants us to believe that Ugandan law does not address the same-sex molestation. However, as I pointed out here, it does. On April 18, 2007, the Uganda Parliament passed The Penal Code Amendment Act of 2007 and [...]

By: Uganda Joint Christian Council recommendations to Parliament for the Anti-Homosexuality Bill — Warren Throckmorton

Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:36:33 +0000

[...] I have demonstrated (and will again soon), boys are protected in current Ugandan law and have been since at least 2007. [...]

By: Martin Ssempa on Line of Fire: An analysis — Warren Throckmorton

Martin Ssempa on Line of Fire: An analysis — Warren Throckmorton — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:16:20 +0000

[...] When Brown asked Ssempa why the law was needed since homosexuality is currently a criminal offense in Uganda, Ssempa mentioned four issues he wanted to see the law address. First, he believes the UN resolution on decriminalization of homosexuality is a threat and so Ugandan law needs to forbid the government from ratifying any such resolution. Second, currently promotion of homosexuality is not criminalized and he believes it should be. Third, lesbianism is not covered in current statute and fourth, boys need to be protected from defilement in the same way girls are. On the last point, he acknowledged for the first time I am aware of that current Ugandan law already covers defilement of boys (see this post). [...]

By: Jayhuck

Jayhuck — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:47:16 +0000

STILL GETTING IT WRONG HERE TOO!

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/uganda-rejects-obamas-pro-homosexual-change/

Accuracy in media strikes again.

LOL – Thanks for that David – Ssempa is crazy and Accuracy in Media is, well, it would be laughable if it weren’t so scary

By: Lynn David

Lynn David — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:19:29 +0000

Bahati et.al. lie about the bill because Bahati/Ssempa/Langa (and where has Langa been lately?) want (wanted?) to homophobically associate gay love-based relationships with male-on-male pedophilia. That’s about all there is about this bill.

By: David Blakeslee

David Blakeslee — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:04:13 +0000

STILL GETTING IT WRONG HERE TOO!

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/uganda-rejects-obamas-pro-homosexual-change/

Accuracy in media strikes again.

By: gayuganda

gayuganda — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:21:02 +0000

Hi,

didnt see the question because couldnt access blogs. Dont ask why.

I dealt with this here, with the help of Dr. Tamale

Debunking lies. Maybe I should tell Bahati to read my blog, more, maybe it will not decrease his lies, maybe it will.

Anyway, the text of both the original, and the changed acts, (And, shame on Bahati, he was a member of the parliament on him at that time), and, he actually used the very wording of the revision but then changed it….! Shame on him indeed.

Anyway, read that blog post for yourself.